[Spread-users] port limitation to int16

[Jonathan Stanton]

Thanks! Obviously a bug.  I see the missed int16 vs int16u and the prints. 

I just saw John Schultz working on a fix also so this should be fixed in SVN soon.

Cheers,

Jonathan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Stanton		jonathan at spreadconcepts.com
Spread Group Messaging	www.spread.org
Spread Concepts LLC 	www.spreadconcepts.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



On Aug 8, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Johannes Wienke wrote:

> Hi again,
> 
> On 08/08/2013 03:41 PM, Johannes Wienke wrote:
> [..]
>> There is an integer overflow in the
>> daemon and this does not only exist in the printing. Actually the socket
>> file in /tmp is really called -17536. The client API doesn't seem to
>> have this overflow and tries to correctly find a file with name 48000.
> 
> Attached is a patch fixing the problems.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Johannes
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: high-port-fix.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4525 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.spread.org/pipermail/spread-users/attachments/20130808/4422ed52/attachment.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> Spread-users at lists.spread.org
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users