[Spread-users] Are all group messages sent to all servers?
Jim Kleckner
jek_subs2 at kleckner.net
Mon Jan 21 10:57:48 EST 2008
Lobiv Igor wrote:
>
> Hi Jim!
>
>
>
> I cannot repeat this behavior. | Version 4.00.00 Built 29/November/2006
>
> I created two daemons D1 and D2 on different computers. To each daemon
> I attached two users. (To D1 I attached users U1 and U2, to D2 I
> attached users U3, U4).
>
> I send safe message from U1 to private group #U2#D1. This message is
> received by U2, but D1 didn't send the message to D2. (I monitored
> traffic via wireshark).
>
> So the question is: how to repeat behavior, described in your letter -
> that "local" traffic sends to all remote daemon (user)?
>
>
>
> Jim Kleckner wrote:
>
> > John Lane Schultz wrote:
>
> >> I believe that all messages, including ones to private groups, go to all
>
> >> daemons right now. There has been talk of optimizing this behavior to
>
> >> only send meta-messages to all daemons and send the actual messages
>
> >> only to those daemons that need them, but this work has not yet been
>
> >> done.
>
> >>
>
Hi Igor -
Did you see broadcast packets on the subnet?
The daemons communicate on a LAN using
broadcast packets.
If you put D1 and D2 into separate segments,
then you should be able to trace TCP traffic
between them if John is correct.
Jim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.spread.org/pipermail/spread-users/attachments/20080121/b9559ab8/attachment.html
More information about the Spread-users
mailing list