[Spread-users] problem trying to msgs to multiple spread instances

Chamikara Jayalath chamikaramj at gmail.com
Sun Aug 17 00:42:04 EDT 2008


Hi John, All,

Is it possible to configure daemons with same IP but different ports to be
in the same DaemonGroup ? (I tried using different config files, but didn't
work).

Thanks,
Chamikara



On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:56 PM, John Lane Schultz <
jschultz at spreadconcepts.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure, but having the same IP listed in a config multiple times
> sounds like it might not work.  I'm willing to bet that Spread uses IPs w/o
> their associated ports as unique daemons IDs.
>
> You definitely can run multiple disjoint configurations on the same node at
> the same time, but having the same IP appear multiple times within one
> config file is probably breaking things.  Although, I could be wrong.
>
> Cheers!
> John
>
> ---
> John Lane Schultz
> Spread Concepts LLC
> Phn: 443 838 2200
> Fax: 301 560 8875
>
> Saturday, August 16, 2008, 8:56:29 PM, you wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am having a problem when trying to run spread with multiple nodes and
> several spread Daemons in each node. I am trying to send a continuous stream
> of msgs to the cluster and measure the average throughput. As long as I run
> only one daemon per node, things work fine. But when I try more than one
> daemon per node none of my client instances receive messages (actually
> things stop working as soon as I change the config file to have more than
> one segment with the same IP and different port). But I don't see any
> exceptions. Have any of you faced a similar problem ?
>
> (I have attached my spread.conf file  since probably I may have done some
> mis-configuration)
>
> Thanks,
> Chamikara
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.spread.org/pipermail/spread-users/attachments/20080817/5e8507be/attachment.html 


More information about the Spread-users mailing list