[Spread-users] Spread Configuration
mark at exonetric.com
Fri Jun 1 04:09:09 EDT 2007
On 31 May 2007, at 17:42, John Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007, Mark Blackman wrote:
>> I wonder if you could elucidate on which cases you might ever wish
>> to have a production system client *not* talk to a local daemon.
>> I.e. in general, should you always have one local daemon per
>> client machine in the best case?
> Yes, the best case is to have a daemon on every machine where there
> are clients and to have the clients connect to their local daemon.
> Sometimes though this is not possible in a deployment because
> Spread has fairly stringent limits on the #'s (30-40) of daemons
> that can be supported within a configuration. In such a case, it
> may make sense to limit the number of daemons and to have clients
> make remote connections to those daemons. The performance will be
> less than optimal but this at least allows the system to function
> where it might otherwise not.
Thanks for confirming.
> John Schultz
> Spread Concepts
> Phn: 443 838 2200
> Spread-users mailing list
> Spread-users at lists.spread.org
More information about the Spread-users