[Spread-users] Re: Spread's maximums

[Daniel Marques]

Thanks for the reply.

I'm really interested in knowing what happens if a VM virtual host
(containing a Spread daemon) moves from one physical host to another:
would the performance degrade severly?  What if it were to move from
one subnet to another?

Thanks for the insite.

Dan

On 7/19/07, Rick Cobb <rcobb at knownow.com> wrote:
> We do it all the time in our development environments, so we know it
> works, but we haven't measured its performance implications. Our
> performance test & production hosts don't use VMWare yet.  Love to hear
> other folks' experience before we remove that "yet".
>
> -- ReC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spread-users-bounces at lists.spread.org
> [mailto:spread-users-bounces at lists.spread.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Marques
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 5:59 AM
> To: spread-users at lists.spread.org
> Subject: [Spread-users] Re: Spread's maximums
>
> As a follow up, does anyone have experience with deploying Spread on a
> VMWare system?  What are the potential performance concerns with such
> a setup?
>
> Dan
>
> On 7/18/07, Daniel Marques <marques77 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm currently evaluating Spread to see if it will fulfil our needs ,
> > and was wondering if there was any hard or soft limits on the maximum
> > number of Spread daemons, Spread processes per daemon, total Spread
> > processes, total groups, and processes per groups.
> >
> > Any insight will be very helpful.  I apologize if this is has an RTM
> answer.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Dan
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> Spread-users at lists.spread.org
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users
>