[Spread-users] Re: Spread's maximums

Rick Cobb rcobb at KnowNow.com
Thu Jul 19 12:23:39 EDT 2007

We do it all the time in our development environments, so we know it
works, but we haven't measured its performance implications. Our
performance test & production hosts don't use VMWare yet.  Love to hear
other folks' experience before we remove that "yet".

-- ReC

-----Original Message-----
From: spread-users-bounces at lists.spread.org
[mailto:spread-users-bounces at lists.spread.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 5:59 AM
To: spread-users at lists.spread.org
Subject: [Spread-users] Re: Spread's maximums

As a follow up, does anyone have experience with deploying Spread on a
VMWare system?  What are the potential performance concerns with such
a setup?


On 7/18/07, Daniel Marques <marques77 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
> I'm currently evaluating Spread to see if it will fulfil our needs ,
> and was wondering if there was any hard or soft limits on the maximum
> number of Spread daemons, Spread processes per daemon, total Spread
> processes, total groups, and processes per groups.
> Any insight will be very helpful.  I apologize if this is has an RTM
> Thanks.
> Dan

Spread-users mailing list
Spread-users at lists.spread.org

More information about the Spread-users mailing list