[Spread-users] Java library DROP JVM 1.1 support?

[Daniel Rall]

On Fri, 01 Apr 2005, toby cabot wrote:

> Jonathan Stanton wrote:
> >Does anyone have a problem with that or a reason we should continue
> >to support 1.1?
> 
> I'm in favor of having a high-performance driver that uses the recent 
> JVM I/O features but you might want to keep the old one around in case 
> someone needs to run it in an applet.

Jonathan, I recommend dropping support for Java 1.1 in favor of 1.2.
A high performance client could be built using Java 1.5's NIO
features, but I would recommend against this being the sole supported
Java client.  Perhaps a conditionally-compiled extension of the
existing client could be provided?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.spread.org/pipermail/spread-users/attachments/20070104/f8ef19f3/attachment.bin