[Fwd: Re: [Spread-users] use a static lib, get rid of .so?]
John Lane Schultz
jschultz at spreadconcepts.com
Fri Feb 9 11:18:13 EST 2007
> as long as i've got you guys on the line, i've got another question.
> after deleting the .so versions of the lib and the symlinks, i'm left
> with these:
>
> libspread.a
> libspread-core.a
> libtspread-core.a
>
> my spread-using apps are currently single-threaded, but they may become
> multi-threaded in the future. shouldn't there be a libtspread.a to link
> against? what's the right thing to link against for multi-threaded
> programs?
For Spread 4, libspread is threadsafe. The core libraries only include the core
spread client library -- they exclude the flush layer and stdutil packages. The
thread safe version of the core library is the one with the t in the name.
Cheers!
--
John Schultz
Spread Concepts LLC
Phn: 443 838 2200
Fax: 301 560 8875
More information about the Spread-users
mailing list