[Spread-users] Spread startup

Ian Eiloart iane at sussex.ac.uk
Tue Sep 26 11:51:20 EDT 2006



--On 26 September 2006 09:26:04 -0400 Theo Schlossnagle <jesus at omniti.com> 
wrote:

> On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>> I have spread configured with this segment only:
>> Spread_Segment 139.184.15.255:4803 {
>>        karpinski       139.184.14.85
>>        chip            139.184.14.86
>>        lynndie         139.184.14.87
>>        sivits          139.184.14.88
>> }
>>
>> I'm using wackamole, configured to share about 20 IP addresses in
>> virtual interfaces ("VIFs") between those four
>> machines. Sometimes, when I use wackatrl -l, I get output like this:
>>
>> Owner: 127.0.0.1
>>        *     lo0:139.184.14.101/32
>>         ->   lo0:139.184.14.70/32
>>
>
> Make sure that "ping `hostname`" on all your boxes pings the expected
> publicly accessible IP address. (85-88).  If not, set your hostname  and
> make sure you have an /etc/hosts entry that points that hostname  to the
> right IP.  That, to me, looks like a wackamole issue more than  a Spread
> issue.

Well, hostname is always set correctly by the time I can get to log in, 
it's set in /etc/hostconfig. The IP address is set by DHCP, so it's not in 
/etc/hosts.

Perhaps that's an alternative solution, but I think Spread would ideally 
check that it has local access to one of the IP addresses in the 
spread_segment definition before starting. Does it not do that?

> // Theo Schlossnagle
> // CTO -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/
> // OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- http://www.omniti.com/
>
>



-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex




More information about the Spread-users mailing list