[Spread-users] Spread startup
Ian Eiloart
iane at sussex.ac.uk
Tue Sep 26 11:51:20 EDT 2006
--On 26 September 2006 09:26:04 -0400 Theo Schlossnagle <jesus at omniti.com>
wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>> I have spread configured with this segment only:
>> Spread_Segment 139.184.15.255:4803 {
>> karpinski 139.184.14.85
>> chip 139.184.14.86
>> lynndie 139.184.14.87
>> sivits 139.184.14.88
>> }
>>
>> I'm using wackamole, configured to share about 20 IP addresses in
>> virtual interfaces ("VIFs") between those four
>> machines. Sometimes, when I use wackatrl -l, I get output like this:
>>
>> Owner: 127.0.0.1
>> * lo0:139.184.14.101/32
>> -> lo0:139.184.14.70/32
>>
>
> Make sure that "ping `hostname`" on all your boxes pings the expected
> publicly accessible IP address. (85-88). If not, set your hostname and
> make sure you have an /etc/hosts entry that points that hostname to the
> right IP. That, to me, looks like a wackamole issue more than a Spread
> issue.
Well, hostname is always set correctly by the time I can get to log in,
it's set in /etc/hostconfig. The IP address is set by DHCP, so it's not in
/etc/hosts.
Perhaps that's an alternative solution, but I think Spread would ideally
check that it has local access to one of the IP addresses in the
spread_segment definition before starting. Does it not do that?
> // Theo Schlossnagle
> // CTO -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/
> // OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- http://www.omniti.com/
>
>
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
More information about the Spread-users
mailing list