[Spread-users] seeing server failures at the client
Ryan Caudy
rcaudy at gmail.com
Thu Apr 21 19:33:44 EDT 2005
That sounds like a networking problem to me. Normally, the clients
would detect that the socket had been closed and return an error, the
next time you tried to use an SP_ function that made a socket call.
Cheers,
Ryan
On 4/21/05, Brian Pinkerton <bplist at thinkpink.com> wrote:
> I'm fairly new to spread, so this may be a naive question:
>
> We're running a fairly busy spread setup with a small number (10's) of
> clients. The other day, someone ran some test code that flooded our
> server with connection requests. He then rebooted the server and
> restarted the daemon. No big deal.
>
> But none of the clients (Java & Perl) got any kind of error at all,
> even after the server was restarted. They just stopped seeing any
> messages (over hours). My assumption was that all the clients would
> get their connections reset when the server was restarted and they'd
> all throw, but at least in this case that didn't happen.
>
> To catch problems like this in the future I'd like to wrap the
> SpreadConnection with another class that re-tries on catastrophic
> failures. I've tried to reproduce the problem, but whatever I do seems
> to result in clients getting exceptions "immediately."
>
> Anyone ever seen anything like this?
>
> thanks,
> brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> Spread-users at lists.spread.org
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users
>
More information about the Spread-users
mailing list