[Spread-users] getting 2 daemons to talk to each other?
Ryan Caudy
caudy at jhu.edu
Thu Mar 20 18:18:57 EST 2003
From your email, it looks to me like you're listing the segments in
different orders for different daemons. You shouldn't do that. ;-)
Typically, the Spread.conf file you use should be identical for all
daemons. The only cases where I have needed to do otherwise were to
print different Alarm flags when debugging Spread itself.
Hope that helps,
--Ryan
Rod Fleischer wrote:
> I have two spread daemons that I can't seem to get to talk to each
> other. My segment configurations are as follows:
>
> On one side of the router (vader, 192.168.1.10):
> Spread_Segment 192.168.1.255:4803 {
>
> vader 192.168.1.10
> }
>
> Spread_Segment 157.185.80.255:4803 {
>
> prince 157.185.80.64
> }
>
>
> On the other side of the router (prince, 157.185.80.64):
> Spread_Segment 157.185.80.255:4803 {
>
> prince 157.185.80.64
> }
>
> Spread_Segment 192.168.1.255:4803 {
>
> vader 192.168.1.10
> }
>
>
> Running tcpdump on both machines shows that they talk to each other
> briefly in very small messages (120 bytes or so) after they've been up
> for about a minute, and that's it. I then have two clients connect to
> the daemons via localhost using the same group identifier string, and
> then multicast a message out in fifo mode. The other side never sees
> the multicast messages, nor do the daemons ever give any visible sign to
> me that they've seen each other.
>
>
> Can anyone give me any clues as to what I'm doing wrong? Thanks much..
>
> -Rod
>
More information about the Spread-users
mailing list