[Spread-users] Spread for large message sizes

[Jacob Green]

There is a Java wrapper to Spread that handles disassembly and
re-assembly while maintaining semantics for most applications.  Refer to
the links below for full discussion on which environments it make sense
to use it and in which it doesn't.

Refer to the discussion here
http://www.spread.org/pipermail/spread-users/2002-June/000815.html.

Refer to the code here
http://lists.spread.org/pipermail/spread-users/2002-May/000784.html.



Jacob Green
Co-Founder, D-Fusion Inc.
 
jgreen at d-fusion.net
http://www.d-fusion.net
410-327-4726 (w)
443-831-9331 (c)
707-885-1055 (f)
2400 Boston St Suite 342
Baltimore, MD 21224 

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: spread-users-admin at lists.spread.org [mailto:spread-users-
>>admin at lists.spread.org] On Behalf Of Doug.Palmer at csiro.au
>>Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 9:14 PM
>>To: spread-users at lists.spread.org
>>Subject: [Spread-users] Spread for large message sizes
>>
>>I'm evaluating spread for use in a distributed simulation/GUI project.
>>
>>Spread has pretty much all the characteristics that I'm looking for,
>>except
>>that the maximum message size seems to be limited to about 128k. Some
of
>>the
>>messages that I want to send range up to 2Mb. I don't really want to
write
>>a
>>message assmembly layer on top of a message assembly layer on top of a
>>message assembly layer on top of ... So:
>>
>>Is the message size a hard limit?
>>Can I change it by settings in spread.conf or somewhere?
>>Is it tied to some fundamental design limit, or could I recompile
spread
>>with different settings? (And if so, how?).
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Spread-users mailing list
>>Spread-users at lists.spread.org
>>http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users