[Spread-users] spread performance looks not very good for me
Joshua Goodall
joshua at roughtrade.net
Thu Dec 11 21:48:28 EST 2003
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:53:59AM -0700, wei_hu at agilent.com wrote:
> There is the result of ifconfig.
> //------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:07:E9:05:60:8D
> inet addr:130.29.116.81 Bcast:130.29.119.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:13789082 errors:206 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:206
> TX packets:513183 errors:4 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:4
> collisions:26948 txqueuelen:100
> RX bytes:459633793 (438.3 Mb) TX bytes:318403650 (303.6 Mb)
> Interrupt:31 Base address:0x2000 Memory:fe6e0000-0
> //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Looks good?
No. You have collisions, RX framing errors, and TX carrier errors.
I manage busy servers that do many gigabytes of traffic daily and show
zero errors and collisions. I'd personally consider more than one or
two a week problematic.
It's highly likely that you have either a cabling or switch problem,
possibly a duplex mismatch.
- J
--
Joshua Goodall "tea makes itself"
joshua at roughtrade.net - Ana Susanj
More information about the Spread-users
mailing list