[Spread-users] Proplem installation Secure Spread (sources)

[Daniel Rall]

I haven't looked at Secure Spread yet, but from your description it
sounds like it is a completely separate package from standard Spread.
I'm curious why it does not wrap and/or simply supply a set of patches
on top of standard Spread?

- Dan

Nita-Rotaru Cristina <crisn at commedia.cnds.jhu.edu> writes:

> Hi Max,
> 
> The make directive will just compile the package along
> with some simple demos. There is no install command defined yet
> (if you checked the Makefile.in file which are used by the configure
> script to generate the Makefiles, there is no install defined.)
> 
> It will probably be added in the future.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> 
> Cristina
> 
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Max K. wrote:
> 
> > hello!
> > i have tried to install Secure Spread Package.
> > from what i saw during the "make" process the makefiles simply were not
> > created properly, either because i've missed something during the
> > reading of README or i have no idea why (thus this letter)
> > well. is this an known issue ?
> > symptom:
> > 1) running "make" compiles the files (and doesn't copy the files to the
> > $prefix/{bin|doc|lib|share| etc. etc. }
> >
> > 2) running "make install" does not copy the proper file to
> > the proper place.
> > so, before i write makefiles by hand (with a perl/shell script of course)
> > can anybody point me out to what is wrong ?