[Spread-users] Static vs. Shared libraries...
sean at chittenden.org
Sat Aug 10 19:20:48 EDT 2002
I just heard through the grapevine, that spread folks prefer the use
of static libraries vs. shared libraries. Can someone
confirm/deny/explain this? I was under the impression that shared
libraries were the way to go for pretty much everything these days. I
understand the (marginal?) speed benefits of statically compiling in
libraries, but... anyone have an authoritative opinion/explanation?
More information about the Spread-users