[Spread-users] port limitation to int16
jschultz at spreadconcepts.com
Thu Aug 8 10:40:51 EDT 2013
Looks like we had roughly the same idea! :)
I think changing the underlying types that hold ports is probably safer because if somewhere someone does:
I think C does the right thing.
John Lane Schultz
Spread Concepts LLC
Cell: 443 838 2200
On Aug 8, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Johannes Wienke wrote:
On 08/08/2013 03:41 PM, Johannes Wienke wrote:
> There is an integer overflow in the
> daemon and this does not only exist in the printing. Actually the socket
> file in /tmp is really called -17536. The client API doesn't seem to
> have this overflow and tries to correctly find a file with name 48000.
Attached is a patch fixing the problems.
More information about the Spread-users