[Spread-users] "Connected closed by Spread" on receiving

[Lisa Vitolo]

Sorry! Gmail failed me and sent the message privately :D I'll repeat it
here.

Thanks for the suggestion. It prints more useful debug messages now, but I
> still can't figure out what they really mean.
>
> - The receiver connects:
> Sess_accept: set sndbuf/rcvbuf to 204800
> Setting TCP_NODELAY on socket 9
> Sess_recv_client_auth: Client requested NULL type authentication
> Sess_session_authorized: Accepting from 127.0.0.1 with private name get on
> mailbox 9
> Sess_read: Message has type field 0x80010080
> Sess_read: queueing message of type 8 with len 0 to the protocol <-- is
> "len 0" here the issue?
>
> - The sender connects:
> Sess_accept: set sndbuf/rcvbuf to 204800
> Setting TCP_NODELAY on socket 10
> Sess_recv_client_auth: Client requested NULL type authentication
> Sess_session_authorized: Accepting from 127.0.0.1 with private name send
> on mailbox 10
>
> - The sender sends the message:
> Sess_read: Message has type field 0x80000081
> Sess_read: queueing message of type 2 with len 0 to the protocol
> Sess_read: Message has type field 0x800000a0
> Sess_read: queueing message of type 16 with len 0 to the protocol
> Sess_read: failed receiving header on session 9: ret -1: error: Connection
> reset by peer
> Sess_kill: killing session get ( mailbox 9 )
>
> Cheers,
> Lisa
>
> Il giorno 20 aprile 2012 20:17, John Schultz <jschultz at spreadconcepts.com>ha scritto:
>
> What does the daemon output around the time your receiver is disconnected?
>>
>> If nothing, then I would add the SESSION flag to your daemon's DebugFlags
>> in its configuration file and re-run to try to see why the daemon is
>> closing your receiver.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> -----
>> John Lane Schultz
>> Spread Concepts LLC
>> Phn: 301 830 8100
>> Cell: 443 838 2200
>>
>>
> --
> They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so
> bad as a lot of ignorance.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.spread.org/pipermail/spread-users/attachments/20120420/9be1ef9e/attachment.html