[Spread-users] Protocol specification ?
philippe.bertin at telenet.be
Tue Feb 2 17:09:22 EST 2010
Haven't you got any problem because of not (always) using representation
OTOH, I fail to see (at first sight) which parts are missing, if not
eventually the lower level bindings. But then again, I don't see too
much use of writing a binding for that lower level, as that is part of
the spread daemon ? So what more binding, on top of what you have
(already now), did you have in mind ?
Per Sandberg wrote:
> You are welcome to have a look, the sources are controlled on sourceforge.
> I have reversed some of the Java- and C- code but not all and my hacks
> needs quite a bit of tidy up but i think its readable.
> On 02/02/2010 09:35 PM, Philippe Bertin wrote:
>> I don't have such a thing, but I am interested in how this maps to Ada.
>> If you have some cvs server, I may (if time permits) help you with such
>> a thing, if not in coding, then eventually in reverse engineering the
>> specs from the code (I've been busy reworking the code recently). I've
>> coded in Ada before (and I liked it, very much).
>> Kind regards,
>> Philippe Bertin.
>> Per Sandberg wrote:
>>> Is there a full spec for the protocol between the application and the
>>> The reason for asking is that I am in the process of updating the
>>> Ada-bindings to spread and i find it simpler (from an architectural
>>> point of view) do a clean binding using higher level constructs then
>>> building on top of the C-library.
>>> Spread-users mailing list
>>> Spread-users at lists.spread.org
More information about the Spread-users