[Spread-users] Unicast using Spread

[Alexey Zakhlestin]

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Alex Bligh <alex at alex.org.uk> wrote:
> This may seem odd, but if I am using Spread for transporting
> messages to groups in a reliable ordered manner, I think it
> also makes sense to use it for reliable delivery of unicast
> messages (i.e. messages between two machines), particularly
> as this would presumably guarantee they would not become
> disordered with relation to group messages. Is there any
> easy way to do this without generating many small groups?

Every time, client connects to the spread network, it is automatically
connected to it's own "private" group. Sending messages to it will
effectively result in unicast

-- 
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/