[Spread-users] spread 4.0rc2, C and multithreading
Jonathan Stanton
jonathan at cnds.jhu.edu
Tue Mar 4 17:12:36 EST 2008
Good point. I do usually take patches like this and actually 'redo' them by searching for the
common pattern and fixing all the instances of it I can find (as if the bug occured in one
place it might be in other files also) so I should have caught the others. But I had not
noticed the difference yet.
Thanks,
Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:15:04PM -0500, John Robinson wrote:
> Jonathan Stanton wrote:
> >I took a look at this patch and it makes sense to me. Missing the unlock
> >on the error path is clearly a bug. I'll apply it.
>
> My read of the patch and source is that the patch only corrects 5 out of
> the 8 places where this missing unlock pattern occurs. (look for all
> the errors: "Session disappeared on us, possible in threaded apps").
>
> Maybe you already noticed this.
>
> /jr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> Spread-users at lists.spread.org
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan R. Stanton jonathan at cs.jhu.edu
Dept. of Computer Science
Johns Hopkins University
-------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Spread-users
mailing list