[Spread-users] Daemon deleting client's un-forwarded messages onclient disconnect?

Daniel Marques marques77 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 13 15:39:00 EDT 2008


Actually, the reason I described my solution in terms of the private
groups is that I was wondering about the "short circuits" that Spread
might have in place.

Generally, will a daemon forward a message to another daemon if it
knows that none of the second daemon's clients belong to any of the
groups that the message was sent to?



On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:12 PM, John Lane Schultz
<jschultz at spreadconcepts.com> wrote:
> Yes, what you propose should give you exactly what you want.  Just to be
> safe though, I would simply send the final real message to both the
> recipient and the sender.  This will ensure that no short circuits are
> invoked (e.g. - sending to your own private group might go on a different
> path than normal messages).
> Cheers!
> ---
> John Lane Schultz
> Spread Concepts LLC
> Phn: 443 838 2200

More information about the Spread-users mailing list