[Spread-users] Re: Question about unexpected spread behaviour

[John Schultz]

Yes, that could easily be the problem.  It would also explain why one 
daemon installed a new view while the other did not (one was running 
faster than the other).

Cheers!

---
John Schultz
Spread Concepts
Phn: 443 838 2200

On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Uma Chingunde wrote:

>> Thanks for the information.
>>> I tried a few more things and I think the reason I was seeing the
>>> unexpected behaviour could be that the machines were seeing a pretty high
>>> load could have led to the token passing taking more time than expected.
>>> Could this be the cause of the frequent partitions and then the
>>> re-merges?
>>> I also saw that the Spread guide recommends running Spread with a higher
>>> priority so I'll be trying that to see if it solves the problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uma