[Spread-users] problems concerning two daemons talking...
Ryan Caudy
caudy at jhu.edu
Sat Mar 29 17:01:36 EST 2003
From the output you showed below, it looks like the problem is that the
daemons aren't communicating, not that the clients can't communicate
through them. Output like:
Configuration at gattaca is:
Num Segments 1
1 192.168.1.255 4803
gattaca 192.168.1.7
suggests that gattaca does not see niche. I would expect similar output
on niche, only listing niche (and not gattaca).
I suspect that your problem is the ports... your output says that the
segment is on port 4803, while the spread.conf you described says it is
on 4805. Both daemons must use spread.conf files with the same segment
list information, in the same order.
Hope this helps,
Ryan
Ian Fung wrote:
> i am trying to get a daemon running on each box, then having each
> client locally connect to its own daemon via spuser and then sending a
> group message where the other machine can see it. here is my spread.conf
>
> Spread_Segment 192.168.1.255:4805 {
> gattaca 192.168.1.7
> niche 192.168.1.6
> }
>
> DebugFlags = { PRINT EXIT MEMBERSHIP }
> DangerousMonitor = true
> RequiredAuthMethods = "NULL"
> AllowedAuthMethods = "NULL"
>
>
> when i run each daemon, they go up. and i get a membership id. at each
> respective site it will display..
>
> ---------------------
> Configuration at gattaca is:
> Num Segments 1
> 1 192.168.1.255 4803
> gattaca 192.168.1.7
> =====================
>
> when i send a j <group> from the client started at niche, i see
> messages in gattaca's debug such as "Send_join: State is 4". when i do
> that from gattaca, i see nothing at niche. it seems the clients can
> not talk to each other via the daemons.
>
> thanks for listening,
>
> ian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> Spread-users at lists.spread.org
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users
>
More information about the Spread-users
mailing list