[Spread-users] Announcing a major new version of the Spread Toolkit 3.17.0 - www.spread.org

Jonathan Stanton jonathan at cnds.jhu.edu
Mon Sep 30 16:15:49 EDT 2002

Yes, the new makefile doesn't 'install' the include files anywhere when
you do 'make install' This isn't on purpose, just an oversight. 

The old 'make install' only worked on linux and was a hack, so I didn't
think to look at what it did once Theo's autoconf patch was applied and
provided a make install. I guess noone using the autoconf patch previously
built programs against installed binaries, but rather built against
complete sources.

I'll correct it.


On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:51:39PM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I have a minor bug report on the new autoconf-generated Makefile.  It
> doesn't seem to copy the include files anywhere!  Is this an
> oversight?  The old Makefile did do this AFAICT.
> --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
> _______________________________________________
> Spread-users mailing list
> Spread-users at lists.spread.org
> http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users

Jonathan R. Stanton         jonathan at cs.jhu.edu
Dept. of Computer Science   
Johns Hopkins University    

More information about the Spread-users mailing list