[Spread-users] Re: [Wackamole-users] restarting automaticaly the Wackamole service
jesus at omniti.com
Fri May 31 16:55:42 EDT 2002
Yair Amir wrote:
>I really am not sure what the problem is.
>I run Spread and immediately I run a client program (sptuser) that
>connects and joins a group.
You don't want that trigger that behaviour with wackamole. If Spread
starts and hasn't performed a daemon membership yet (comes up alone at
first), then wackamole will start, see no peers and then assume all the
IP address which will confuse everyone tremendously. You really only
want wackamole to work on stable, settled Spread rings. Hence the 10
seconds -- which works "most" of the time for me. On some machines I
set it up to 1 minute.
>Spread takes a few seconds to complete the membership, but once it
>does, the client gets a response for the join. Is your case different?
On some of my machine it can take 15 - 30 seconds to complete the daemon
>In general, forking, setsid, etc. are things I would usually avoid if not
>necessary in order to keep the code simple and portable to any kind of
>environment (not only unix).
All of the code now "knows" if it is unix by arch.h. And the autoconf
patches I supplied make it very easy to use setsid and fork only if they
Spread is supposed to be a daemon... Like it or not, daemons on unix
should setsid and fork... it's just they way things are -- as dictated
by Stevens ;-) Otherwise the process is susceptable to receiving
unwanted signals from its parent process and has a controlling terminal
(which it should not).
OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- http://www.omniti.com/
Phone: +1 301 776 6376 Fax: +1 410 880 4879
1024D/82844984/95FD 30F1 489E 4613 F22E 491A 7E88 364C 8284 4984
2047R/33131B65/71 F7 95 64 49 76 5D BA 3D 90 B9 9F BE 27 24 E7
More information about the Spread-users