[Spread-users] Anon cvs, yes, no, etc.
jon at latchkey.com
Mon Oct 22 16:43:26 EDT 2001
on 10/22/01 12:24 PM, "Theo E. Schlossnagle" <jesus at omniti.com> wrote:
> Jon Stevens wrote:
>> on 9/18/01 7:16 AM, "Yair Amir" <yairamir at cnds.jhu.edu> wrote:
>>> Instead of focusing on the particular anon-cvs point, I have decided to post
>>> on the list the much broader vision behind CNDS (and Spread Concepts). I
>>> that understanding this vision will shed light on some of the issues some of
>>> you were worried about. It can also help those in the community that are
>>> interested to help us advance that vision in ways broader than contributing
>> 1 month and still waiting.
> I thought this was answered. My understanding was that CVS access is
> available to any who wants it. It is not anonymous. If I am mistaken, feel
> free to correct me.
I never saw a posting from Yair about "the much broader vision behind CNDS
(and Spread Concepts)."
If I missed a posting that specifically resolves the above, feel free to
send me the link.
More information about the Spread-users